
Every week or so I get an email offering me a sure-fire return on my money of 6%, 7% or 8% a year.
All I have to do is secure the right to buy a canal-side property with a 20% deposit on the £115,000 apartments, which are only a few minutes from shops and offices.
They haven’t been built yet but the artist’s impressions show spacious 40m2 units with lots of glass to enjoy the views of the water.
I am told that property in this northern city is rising in price by 9.7% a year, yet still well below the national average.
And local rental increases are even bigger. Hence the guaranteed return.
Unlike the apartment pedlars, the firms making these promises are regulated
These emails have saved me a fortune. I have never sent them a penny. The same principle has won me thousands on the National Lottery — I’ve never bought a ticket.
But recently a much more tempting offer has come my way: a guaranteed return of 4.55% a year for five years; capital not at risk.
On the maximum safe investment of £85,000, that is an income of £3,867 a year. Guaranteed.
As a pensioner I could get a smidge more by giving my money to an insurance company and buying an annuity, but the capital is not so much at risk as guaranteed to disappear on the day I die. I don’t gamble, especially with an insurance company, about my death. It always wins.
Regulatory protection
Suppose I do not want to tie up my money for five years? Well, I can get 4.41% a year over two years, which is only £119 a year less than with the five-year deal. Capital not at risk.
I defy any adviser to guarantee a return of 4.8% over the next five years in investments — especially with capital not at risk
And, unlike the apartment pedlars, the businesses making these promises are Financial Conduct Authority regulated and covered by the Financial Services Compensation Scheme. So, should things go horribly wrong, my capital would still not be at risk, though the anticipated returns might come to an end a bit early.
A year ago, the best safe return over five years was 2.05%, and a year before that it was 1.55%. Anyone who committed to those would be feeling very sick today. But that was the era of nano-rates, when Barclays Bank paid 0.01% on its Everyday Saver account. Barclays’ UK profits in 2021 were £8.4bn; now we know why. Savers struggled to get even single figures on an instant access account.
I remind them inflation affects the value of investments just as much as it does cash
So where does this guaranteed, ‘capital not at risk’, long-term income from cash deposits leave traditional investments — apart from far behind?
Investors will say even 4.55% a year is much less than half the rate of inflation in November when the Consumer Prices Index showed a rise in prices of 10.7%. .
‘So,’ they smile, ‘capital not at risk? Of course it is. Inflation at that rate will mean your £85,000 will be worth less than £50,000 by 2028. I don’t call a £35,000 loss “capital not at risk”!’
I remind them inflation affects the value of investments just as much as it does cash. And, although the value of capital invested can rise ahead of inflation, it can also plummet.
A year ago, the best safe return over five years was 2.05%, and a year before that it was 1.55%
So, there is not an adviser on the planet (or at least not a regulated adviser in the UK) who will tell you how much your invested capital will be worth in five years’ time in nominal terms, never mind after inflation.
Flawed study
‘OK, but what about the Barclays Equity Gilt Study that shows investment in shares consistently outperforms cash in the long term?’ they say.
Sadly, that is a flawed study. First, it exaggerates the return on investment by taking no account of charges levied on investors in the real world. Second, it understates the return on cash by using the rate paid by just one building society account, which, since 1998, has been Nationwide’s InvestDirect account.
In 2021, when the research for the 2022 study was done, that account paid 0.01%. But in the middle of that year the best ‘no notice’ account paid 50 times as much and the best one-year account paid 90 times as much.
Of course, in the long term a balanced portfolio of investments will outperform cash.
I don’t gamble, especially with an insurance company, about my death. It always wins
But capital is at risk, there are no guarantees, and most people underestimate just how long ‘long term’ is. Some say as little as five years. But I defy any adviser to guarantee a return of 4.8% over the next five years in investments — especially with capital not at risk.
What to do with a spare £85,000? That is the cash conundrum.
Paul Lewis is a financial journalist, host of Radio 4’s Money Box and author of ‘Money Box – a money toolkit for life’
This article featured in the January 2023 edition of MM. If you would like to subscribe to the monthly magazine, please click here.

As Benjamin Franklin said “Nothing is certain except death and taxes.”
Well, Mr Lewis, I can ‘defy’ you. Have just written a significant sum into a structured deposit, fully FSCS protected with a guaranteed return (regardless of index performance) of 5.15% p.a. over 4 years. An additional 0.5% is payable if the FTSE100 is above strike level at maturity but that is by the by really. More than happy to share the product details with you to prove this but please refrain from these overhyped headline grabbers that in some cases are wholly contestable.
Well it’s all down to 3 basic factors:
Time Horizon
Attitude to risk
Need for income
Then it may be a case of eggs and baskets. Money is like manure – best if it’s spread.
Excellent tips and analogy especially considering the shysters still scamming people for their hard earned cash without a care.
FCA smell the coffee or better still the BS.
Comedy Gold from Paul Lewis (again!)
Paul you live under your rock and occasionally you come out trying to portray yourself as a “Financial Journalist”.
You say “Every week or so I get an email offering me a sure-fire return on my money” — well, why don’t you just unsubscribe or block the emails and get on with your life?
As far as the Β£85,000 is concerned – you can try to “defy any adviser” but while you sit on the sidelines pontificating, Advisers you defy are getting on with their Regulated work using their experience and qualifications.
Until you get qualified and regulated as an “Adviser” you will continue to be “comedy gold”.
More silly witterings from one of MMβs extensive panel of unqualified, uninsured, non-regulated, non-practicing hobbyists.
There really is no conundrum here: Your side emergency fund – CASH! Monies for any big ticket expenses coming up in the next 5 years, (new car, big holiday, daughters wedding etc) – CASH! The fund to get you through a multi-decade retirement of ever rising living costs – MOST DEFINITELY NOT CASH!
Still, at least today he isnβt firing off baseless insults at the small independent mortgage adviser community.
Honestly, in a world where people like Paul Lewis get so much airtime, something has gone seriously wrong.
“hobbyists” …. spot on Ian